<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hate Life, Will Travel &#187; Cheater&#8217;s Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zumsteg.net/category/cheaters-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zumsteg.net</link>
	<description>Derek Zumsteg's site of doom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 05:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The roller coaster of book quality perception</title>
		<link>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/03/17/the-roller-coaster-of-book-quality-perception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/03/17/the-roller-coaster-of-book-quality-perception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheater's Guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/03/17/the-roller-coaster-of-book-quality-perception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of years ago, when my initial, pretty aggressive deadline for turning in a manuscript came due, I talked to my editor and had a conversation that more or less went like this: Me: Sooooo&#8230; how&#8217;s the weather up there in the northeast? Good? What&#8217;s going on? How are you? Editor: Where&#8217;s my book? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago, when my initial, pretty aggressive deadline for turning in a manuscript came due, I talked to my editor and had a conversation that more or less went like this:<br />
Me: Sooooo&#8230; how&#8217;s the weather up there in the northeast? Good? What&#8217;s going on? How are you?<br />
Editor: Where&#8217;s my book?<br />
Me: Ah. Good question. Really good question. Here&#8217;s the thing: I&#8217;ve got about 25% of a really great book done.<br />
(pause)<br />
Editor: Uh huh.<br />
Me: And I could turn a manuscript with meeting the contractually obligated word count right now.<br />
Editor: Okay.<br />
Me: Or we could take more time and do a book that&#8217;s 100% great.<br />
Editor: Yeah, let&#8217;s go ahead and take that option.</p>
<p>Doing the research for the book I discovered that almost every source I tracked down provided a hint of something else: Gaylord Perry led to Tommy John&#8217;s scuffing, tracing hecklers led to O&#8217;Toole and Adelis led to booster clubs. Every week I kept working at any chapter, all the other chapters improved.</p>
<p>But my list of research to-dos only grew.</p>
<p>Eventually, I had another conversation with my editor, which went:<br />
Editor: Give me the book.<br />
Me: I&#8217;m looking into this fascinating sideline about stadiums that burned down&#8230;<br />
Editor: Give me the book.<br />
Me: &#8230; and there&#8217;s this amazing thing that happened in the 1920s with bat manufacturing&#8230;<br />
Editor: In a second, hired goons are going to come to your door. You need to provide them with the current version of the manuscript.<br />
(ding-dong)<br />
Me: Okay.</p>
<p>That defined the book&#8217;s scope. It had to happen eventually, but I still felt disappointed.</p>
<p>An abbreviated summary of my feelings towards the book since then:<br />
Turned it in: excited, uncertain<br />
Everyone loves the first draft but they want huge changes: relieved, happy, terrified<br />
Drafts 2-4: increasingly weary<br />
After copyediting, when I&#8217;d read the book for the 79th time: I despise this book. It&#8217;s boring, it&#8217;s flat, I should replace all the anecdotes and examples.<br />
After a break: I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m too close to make judgments<br />
After hearing from advanced readers: They seem really happy, but maybe my editor sent the goons around.<br />
Library Journal review: Woo-hoo! It really is good! This is great!</p>
<p>Then yesterday, I got the Entertainment Weekly review, which liked it but gave it a &#8216;B&#8217; (stand-up double) and I was, initially, really mad: how dare they only give it a B! I worked on it for years!</p>
<p>And then I thought &#8220;hey, they liked it enough to review it and say nice things, even if they didn&#8217;t think it was a masterpiece&#8230; that&#8217;s pretty cool.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like getting a bad review in the New York Times Book Review: as the editors will tell you, the fact that they&#8217;re reviewing you at all says something about the quality and noteworthiness of the book.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s strange, though &#8212; the book&#8217;s out. The quality of the book is set. It&#8217;s not going to get better, or worse. All that remains is for people to read it, and yet here I am, pulling for the next review to be positive, the same way I try and body-english a line drive down the line fair when I&#8217;m at a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/03/17/the-roller-coaster-of-book-quality-perception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First review for Cheater&#8217;s Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/01/25/first-review-for-cheaters-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/01/25/first-review-for-cheaters-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheater's Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zumsteg.net/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Library Journal. And they loved it! Woooooo! No link yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Library Journal. And they loved it! Woooooo! No link yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zumsteg.net/2007/01/25/first-review-for-cheaters-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

